Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

UEFA Looks to Rugby for New Referee's Rule



RM-Taylor

He's Magic.... You Know
NSC Patron
Jan 7, 2006
15,292
Uefa is considering copying rugby's lead by allowing only captains to talk to referees during games.
In a Football Focus special report to be aired on BBC One on Saturday, Uefa's William Gaillard admits the current situation is becoming "dangerous".

He believes captains should take more liability for the game's direction.

"It's common in rugby to call both captains and say 'cut it out, the game is not taking the right course and it is up to you'," said Gaillard.

The Uefa spokesman also admitted that European football's governing body was concerned at the breakdown in relations between officials and players and managers, particularly when the disputes result in violence at amateur level.

"What is really worrying is what is happening in the lower leagues," he said.

Former referee David Elleray
"There is somebody injured almost every weekend somewhere in Europe.

"That means the national associations can't find referees at the grass-roots level.

"If you don't find referees there, very soon you won't find referees for the lower divisions of the professional game and ultimately the elite (divisions)."

Gaillard disagreed, however, that the quality of refereeing had deteriorated.

He said it was the same as it had been for "a century and a half" and that errors were still rare.

Former international referee David Elleray agrees with Gaillard and points to the increased scrutiny that officials are under - thanks to television - as the cause of the heightened awareness of refereeing mistakes.

And Elleray, who retired from refereeing in 2003, said players, managers, fans and the media have to accept that referees will make mistakes from time to time.

He does not, however, think officials should be exempt from criticism if they make an error, as long as the criticism is measured and in context.

"I think it would be sad if we said that you can never comment on a decision or say a referee made a mistake," said Elleray.

"We comment on players making mistakes - for example, Saha missing the penalty (against Celtic on Tuesday).

"It was a crucial error but he didn't deliberately miss it, and it doesn't mean he is an incompetent player.

"But if the referee had made a similar error in that game there would be questions about his integrity, judgement and competence.

"It's what is behind the criticism, and the nature of the criticism, that is damaging for referees and football, not the criticism itself."

Elleray said that like Uefa he was concerned the current spate of high-profile rows following contentious refereeing decisions would hurt football.

"Retaining and recruiting referees at the grass-roots level is already difficult," he said.

"And without referees the game will descend into anarchy and chaos."
 




Barrel of Fun

Abort, retry, fail
RM-Taylor said:
Uefa is considering copying rugby's lead by allowing only captains to talk to referees during games.
In a Football Focus special report to be aired on BBC One on Saturday, Uefa's William Gaillard admits the current situation is becoming "dangerous".

He believes captains should take more liability for the game's direction.

"It's common in rugby to call both captains and say 'cut it out, the game is not taking the right course and it is up to you'," said Gaillard.

About bloody time! They have consistently ignored how well it works in rugby. What on earth do UEFA et al get upto in their office hours.

"Right we need 64 numbered balls for the UEFA cup draw"

"We have still got the same lot from last year"

"Brilliant. Nothing to do today in that case"
 


Tony Meolas Loan Spell

Slut Faced Whores
Jul 15, 2004
18,069
Vamanos Pest
A very good idea. There are some things that we could borrow from our egg chasing friends and this is one of them.

Wasnt it FIFA who introduced and then a bit later scrapped the 10 yards rule for dissent following he award of a free kick?

However there must also be a system in place where blatantly incompetent referees (and there are some) are never allowed near a football match.

Mind you our egg chasing friends are alot "tougher" than some of the overpaid, overpampered, alice band wearing pansies that POLLUTE the beautiful game.
 


crodonilson

He/Him
Jan 17, 2005
13,959
Lyme Regis
Excellent idea, for all the blood and thunder of rugby, they have much more discipline than there prima donna soccer counterparts.
 


Jam The Man

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
8,187
South East North Lancing
What about allowing physios onto the field of play instead of stopping the game?
 




DJ Leon

New member
Aug 30, 2003
3,446
Hassocks
None of this rocket sceince. It would be easy to cut out dissent, diving etc, but the FA doesn't do it - largely because it's managed by directionless morons with no balls whatsoever.
 


Barrel of Fun

Abort, retry, fail
I think the FA are trying not to be too harsh on this sort of behaviour. After all, there are further rumblings that the Premier League are looking to break away and control all the of £bn's they produce.

I like the idea of roll on subs, should a player get injured, but not sure it would work and would probably be abused.
 
Last edited:


tedebear

Legal Alien
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
17,005
In my computer
Jam The Man said:
What about allowing physios onto the field of play instead of stopping the game?

I was thinking that too - could help stop the diving and rolling about business...although maybe football is too fast and all over the pitch which would make the physio get in the way?

Like the thinking of the captain only talking to the ref. Also i can't stand players who still insist on hugging touching patting referees....Out of order IMO!
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here