kevo
Well-known member
- Mar 8, 2008
- 9,539
I wonder if anything will emerge about why he was suspended. Puts to bed the idea people were bandying around that 'no-one gets suspended without good reason', 'no smoke without fire' etc. He was cleared of all wrong-doing yet had to endure the ignominy of the club's disciplinary procedure. Seems pretty odd to me.
I wouldn't be surprised if the outcome for Charlie was the same (wouldn't look particularly good for the club that, dragging a loyal servant like him through the mud for no reason).
We are all assuming that what Poyet has allegedly done is much worse than whatever Tanno was accused of.
The one thing that remains absolutely baffling for me is that all three have apparently been suspended for different reasons. Who ever heard of a company suspending three of its senior employees at the same time for unrelated incidents? Whatever your view of the situation regarding Gus, it DOES make it seem like a witch hunt, even if it isn't one - as if the club are determined to get rid of the whole management and coaching team, whatever it takes.
I wouldn't be surprised if the outcome for Charlie was the same (wouldn't look particularly good for the club that, dragging a loyal servant like him through the mud for no reason).
We are all assuming that what Poyet has allegedly done is much worse than whatever Tanno was accused of.
The one thing that remains absolutely baffling for me is that all three have apparently been suspended for different reasons. Who ever heard of a company suspending three of its senior employees at the same time for unrelated incidents? Whatever your view of the situation regarding Gus, it DOES make it seem like a witch hunt, even if it isn't one - as if the club are determined to get rid of the whole management and coaching team, whatever it takes.
Last edited: