Tubby-McFat-Fuc
Well-known member
Something just struck me. I feel I'm fairly right in my views on Oscar on the other threads, but are we missing something?
He came here promising attacking football. Many would agree that this has been far from the case.
We have had a bad injury list this season, but not once has Oscar changed formation/tactics to suit the players he has.
We all thought that Oscar being our "Head Coach" and not manager was due to Poyet's possible court case.
But is their another reason? Has Oscar been told to keep the system.... "The Brighton Way"... if you like, and does he have his hands tied?
The last time I recall he switched to a more basic 4-4-2 was against QPR in the 73rd minute. We all know what happened there. Exiciting attacking football and goals in the right end. But since he's gone back to the "Brighton Way".
So whilst a lot are calling him boring, including me, could he switch to a sy for example 4-4-2 if he wanted to, or as head coach and not manager, can he only coach the players to play "our" system, and not manage the system as a manager would? So does the term head coach mean exactly that in our case?
So the question I would liked asked is "Oscar, a lot of fans are saying we are too negative and would like to see a more attacking/direct system (as he was asked last week). Is it your choice to play this system, or is it a system the club want to play? Could you play a 4-4-2 or 5-4-1 or another system if you wanted to".
Why else could it be that he will not change, despite our goals scored this year being pathetic in comparison to our league position. Surely with the amount of injuries we've had, you would have thought a "manager" in full control would have adapted the system....... starting to wonder now if getting on Oscars back is fair!
He came here promising attacking football. Many would agree that this has been far from the case.
We have had a bad injury list this season, but not once has Oscar changed formation/tactics to suit the players he has.
We all thought that Oscar being our "Head Coach" and not manager was due to Poyet's possible court case.
But is their another reason? Has Oscar been told to keep the system.... "The Brighton Way"... if you like, and does he have his hands tied?
The last time I recall he switched to a more basic 4-4-2 was against QPR in the 73rd minute. We all know what happened there. Exiciting attacking football and goals in the right end. But since he's gone back to the "Brighton Way".
So whilst a lot are calling him boring, including me, could he switch to a sy for example 4-4-2 if he wanted to, or as head coach and not manager, can he only coach the players to play "our" system, and not manage the system as a manager would? So does the term head coach mean exactly that in our case?
So the question I would liked asked is "Oscar, a lot of fans are saying we are too negative and would like to see a more attacking/direct system (as he was asked last week). Is it your choice to play this system, or is it a system the club want to play? Could you play a 4-4-2 or 5-4-1 or another system if you wanted to".
Why else could it be that he will not change, despite our goals scored this year being pathetic in comparison to our league position. Surely with the amount of injuries we've had, you would have thought a "manager" in full control would have adapted the system....... starting to wonder now if getting on Oscars back is fair!