Red'n'Blue
New member
- Jan 6, 2011
- 1,626
I'm back Phil. I see you missed me.
No they were part of our 1st team squad.Ambrose was a match winner on his day but on other days was weak and not exactly your battling Championship type.Scannell needed a move, has bags of potential but was not in our best 11 but others will say otherwise being a Local lad etc.
Only 6 players started more games than them. Whether you like it or not, whether you see their value or not, your manager made them two of the 8 most started players in your squad last season. Not only are they, according to your manager, in the first eleven, they are in the first 8.
At least they have Murray to knock in 20 goals for them next season
Why is he being touche when he has just supplied you with facts ? It's obvious you don't like the truth.Touché!
Clearly you are not familiar with basic logic. The person making a claim has to provide some proof, not the other way around.
E.g. I can fly. This is true, because you can't prove that I can't.
Why is he being touche when he has just supplied you with facts ? It's obvious you don't like the truth.
Only 6 players started more games than them. Whether you like it or not, whether you see their value or not, your manager made them two of the 8 most started players in your squad last season. Not only are they, according to your manager, in the first eleven, they are in the first 8.
That's how I see it,and Dougie obviously does too.The 3 new players will all play more than the 2 we are talking aboutThats why they were let go.We need a left winger and maybe a striker hopefully with Baxter and our 1st 11 will be a match for anyone.I can't see us going down and don't think you lot will go up either but you never know ...
Lol! but they might be happy with the parachute payments.......I would LOVE to prove that you can`t fly.
I'm back Phil. I see you missed me.
Important players well Ambrose was anyway.Not our best and neither started in our Amex romp.
What does that tell you?
Clearly you are not familiar with basic logic. The person making a claim has to provide some proof, not the other way around.
E.g. I can fly. This is true, because you can't prove that I can't.
Ah, you're back. Can you send Seaside to the naughty step now please. He's been telling all sorts of porkies.
Naughty Seaside.
Yes he is.
Good to see the only realistic Palace fan back.
What's your take on the Parish broadcast?
Did you listen to that? Thought Parish talked some sense. Nothing much we already didn't know. Dougie looked fed up a Welling. Going to be a tough season IMO.