So now we have a 50mph average speed limit on both sides of the M25 through the construction zone for this new service area ... and apparently it is going to be in place for a year.
It seems to me that all they need to do initially is build the entry and exit lanes to the project and then reopen the full width of the M25 carriageways. Surely that cannot take a year? The construction can then continue within the service area without disrupting the M25 traffic. Or is that to glaringly simple?
A further question would be why they didn't construct the entry and exit lanes for this project when they first built the M25 so that whenever it was built it could be done with minimum disruption to the motorway. Or didn't they have that much foresight?
Personally I question the need for a further service area there when there is one not that much further along the M25 at Clackett Lane.
The delays the project is causing on the M25 during the rush-hour are REALLY PISSING ME OFF.
It seems to me that all they need to do initially is build the entry and exit lanes to the project and then reopen the full width of the M25 carriageways. Surely that cannot take a year? The construction can then continue within the service area without disrupting the M25 traffic. Or is that to glaringly simple?
A further question would be why they didn't construct the entry and exit lanes for this project when they first built the M25 so that whenever it was built it could be done with minimum disruption to the motorway. Or didn't they have that much foresight?
Personally I question the need for a further service area there when there is one not that much further along the M25 at Clackett Lane.
The delays the project is causing on the M25 during the rush-hour are REALLY PISSING ME OFF.