Norman in the Argus

[Curious Orange]

What a contemptible man he is:

Seagulls should fly from Prescott’s patronage

I was surprised by the defence of John Prescott mounted by those connected with Brighton and Hove Albion Football Club following my referral of matters relating to Mr Prescott to the Metropolitan Police for investigation.

There have been a large number of questions asked about Mr Prescott's behaviour in recent months.

These include his misuse of Dorneywood, which he has now had to relinquish, his non-payment of council tax, which he has had to repay, and questionable meetings with an American businessman hoping to open a casino in the former Millennium Dome and his acceptance of hospitality and gifts from that individual.
continued...

I believe there are issues which need to be considered in relation to Mr Prescott's behaviour under the Prevention of Corruption Acts 1906 and 1916 and I have therefore made a formal complaint to the Metropolitan Police in this regard.

As part of those enquiries, I believe it is reasonable for his behaviour in relation to the Falmer issue to be examined.

My views on Mr Prescott are not unique. In a recent opinion poll, the vast majority of the public expressed the belief that he is not doing a good job and should resign as Deputy Prime Minister. The Daily Mirror alleges even cabinet ministers barely talk to him and find him "increasingly irrelevant".

It is therefore surprising to see the staunch defence of Mr Prescott advanced by those connected with Brighton and Hove Albion.

My complaint is in respect of Mr Prescott, not anyone connected with the Albion.

I would have thought it advisable for the Albion to be distancing themselves from the Deputy Prime Minister at this time, rather than endorsing him.

Norman Baker MP

I don't recall anyone from the Albion endorsing Prescott, rather pointing out that his visit to Adenstar couldn't possibly have had anything to do with Falmer, as Baker keeps insinuating despite the fact that he knows better.

 

[The Large One]

What a f***ing idiot. No-one at the Albion has 'endorsed' Prescott.

Dick Knight's point was to do with the stuff Baker said about Derek Chapman, and his implied underhand links with John Prescott - which was a disgraceful slur. He is just making things up as he goes along. Do you suppose his pants are on fire as well?

I do look forward to saying hello to Norman Baker at the end of September.

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

The bloke is spinning lies yet again.

Can't someone Sue this tosser

 

[Tooting Gull]

Loathsome, contemptible and deceitful. Reading that, it's almost as if he was Falmer's biggest fan before Prescott got involved.

 

[Albion Rob]

Since when has "not doing a good job" been akin to corruption? So he's not very good at what he does. So what, that certainly negates the need for a trip to the High Court then doesn't it.

"No, no, John, you're alright. I'm not saying you were corrupt in making the Falmer decision, merely that you're not doing a very good job. By the way, did you know I represent a rival political party?"

And how dare he refer to our club as the Albion. Please don't use a term of endearment towardas a football club you are actively seeking to kill. Please don't use this term of endearment when you are actively throttling a football club that brings joy to tens of thousands of people in Sussex for the sake of about 30 people in Falmer who despite living next to a virtual motorway and in amongst rowdy students seem to think that football fans forking out half a week's wages to take their families to games are going to samsh up the place and clog up the duck pond with cars.

Pathetic.

 

[Icy Gull]

There have been a large number of questions asked about Mr Prescott's behaviour in recent months
B]

Ditto Baker ...****

 

[HampshireSeagulls]

He's a media whore. His ugly face has been appearing with horrifying regularity in the papers/news these days, he jumps onto any passing bandwagon with consummate skill.

In fact, he could be setting himself up as the LibDem equivalent to Prescott, he is certainly heading that way with the determination to get his opinions (worthless as they are) into print. Can't see him landing a punch on a protester, granted, he would be far busier trying to hide behind the nearest wall/hedge/policeman!

 

[colinpants]

that bloke is an utter c**t, he just doesn't know when to shut up.

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

Why on earth would anybody voluntarily vote for this loathsome creep? Who's he supposed to be representing over Falmer other than his behind-closed-doors cronies? Certainly not his constituents.

 

[DIFFBROOK]

The man is using Prescotts situation to a) score Political points against the Labour Govt and b) to stop Falmer and kill the Albion

By using making Political capital out of Prescott, I cant see how the Govt will now back down on Falmer. By doing so it will be admitting that one of their Ministers (and the Deputy PM at that ) decision making was flawed. And if that is the case with Prescott, then who next. No, I think its Baker who has made one hell of a mistake in linking Falmer with Prescott.

Maybe, just maybe if he stuck with reasoned argument then he and LDC might have had a slim chance. By turning it into a Political argument as well, the Govt cant be seen to move.


And, yes I too look forward to giving him grief in September.

 

[Lammy]

This man is my MP.

God I'm depressed

 

[Rich Suvner]

BRING ON THE LIB-DEM CONFERENCE

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

Norman Baker
Mischief Maker

 

[The Large One]

Norman Baker
Mischief Maker

Liberty Taker
Belly Acher
f*** Saker

 

[Lord Bracknell]

There is a very good letter being sent in response.

 

[Curious Orange]

There is a very good letter being sent in response.

Does it mention Baker's connection to Bellotti? Thus insinuating that Baker has been conspiring to destroy the Albion since the early '90s?

 

[The Large One]

Can we see it, please? Can we? Please. Please. Can we?

Just to check for typos, you understand.

 

[The Auditor]

There is a very good letter being sent in response.

surely there must be some "dirt" to be dug on Norman.....I seem to remember reading that he was very keen to find out what "the security forces" had on record about him

 

[Lord Bracknell]

The only typo I've found so far is a mis-spelling of OLEAGINOUS.

 

[El Presidente]

Typos such as Norman C*unt instead of Baker.......actually that is not a typo