Jack Straw
I look nothing like him!
A man had to have the ends of both feet amputated. Soon after the operation he sadly died. Turns out he was lack toes intolerant.
A man had to have the ends of both feet amputated. Soon after the operation he sadly died. Turns out he was lack toes intolerant.
A man had to have the ends of both feet amputated. Soon after the operation he sadly died. Turns out he was lack toes intolerant.
But hold on. If he was lack toes intolerant - that would mean that "with his toes he was fine". So why
both amputated? Your logic is all wrong here.
As usual, the crass headline contains no context what so ever. Surely we need to know why exactly the poor man had to have the ends of both feet amputated, surely that would lead to a clue about how he died?
But we know how he died. An extreme allergy to having no toes is what did it. This does hint at negligence on the part of the hospital though in not testing for intolerances.
But we know how he died. An extreme allergy to having no toes is what did it. This does hint at negligence on the part of the hospital though in not testing for intolerances.
That's a shocking diagnosis. Lactose (note the correct spelling) intolerance is nothing to do with feet. I fear for the NHS, I really do.
As usual, the crass headline contains no context what so ever. Surely we need to know why exactly the poor man had to have the ends of both feet amputated, hopefully that will lead to a clue about how he died? RIP to the fella and condolences to his family, especially at this time of year.
Who mentioned he was treated in the NHS? He may have gone private and the amputation of all toes could be due to a lack of risk assessment by the private sector?
I would like some clarity regarding the amputation of the ENDS OF BOTH FEET
Amputation of the ends of both feet means the removal of the bits of both feet furthest away, ie the ends. Have you not read the latest edition of Lancet?