aolstudios
Well-known member
Yeah, rightThe refuge of someone with nothing of value to respond with. My posts are not anti-semetic, they are thoughts of common decency.
Yeah, rightThe refuge of someone with nothing of value to respond with. My posts are not anti-semetic, they are thoughts of common decency.
Why play the antisemite card when the Israeli far right government are criticized?You say that because you're an Antisemite. Obvious with every post
'the Antisemite card'.Why play the antisemite card when the Israeli far right government are criticized?
Think there is some truth in what he is saying, they want the world to look away from the genocide that is occurring. They know International support is starting to crack...
What is your view on Sir Kier not asking for a a ceasefire?
It's from the BBC and was released today. I've read this thread with interest and I was surprised that it hadn't been added already Earlier in the thread someone was heavily criticised for making claims about atrocities without providing evidence. If you were a unbiased as you claim then you wouldn't mind seeing a current news article appear on the thread.And how often someone has posted something along these lines in response to posts about the mounting casualties in Gaza - presumably to justify Israel’s response and imply those that question it or show concern for innocent civilians are supporting terrorism.
It's difficult to justify any of this.This is not NEW news. This is horrific, it is inexcusable, it is barbaric. It is true.
It is also propaganda.
This was known, and reported on, on October 7th and the following days. There has been a campaign by Israeli social media influencers to bring this story back to the top of the news headlines for the last few days. It is a smoke screen to disguise their genocide and human rights abuses in their reignited military campaign in southern Gaza. What happened to the initial victims on around the 7/10 has cannot be erased, nor is if a valid reason to kill TENS OF THOUSANDS of Palestinians (of which a large part are innocent children).
I am getting more angry with one side in this conflict everyday. Both sides are to blame, but one far more so than the other. One side really should know better, but they choose to use influence, power, subtefuge and downright lies to elicit support from the West. That same side is beginning to make anti-semitism seem less objectionable than it should be.
I certainly don’t mind - (I actually hadn’t seen the news story) although some might find these stories too horrifying to want to see them posted - but what I mind is when reports like these are posted as a push back against posts relating to the appalling number of fatalities in Gaza with the intention of diminishing or even justifying Israel’s blanket bombardments of Gaza - because they are being routinely posted by those who ‘support’ what Israel are doing.If you were a unbiased as you claim then you wouldn't mind seeing a current news article appear on the thread.
When you see the maps of destruction it's hard to see how any folk could cope there. It's quite shocking.I have a feeling that Gaza will be flattened to such an extent that no-one can live there in the future, not Palestinians, not Hamas, nobody.
Literally a Dead Zone.
I guess that means Egypt will have to suck up the 2 million or so refugees, presume Israel will help out?
Israelis will live there and it will thrive.I have a feeling that Gaza will be flattened to such an extent that no-one can live there in the future, not Palestinians, not Hamas, nobody.
Literally a Dead Zone.
I guess that means Egypt will have to suck up the 2 million or so refugees, presume Israel will help out?
Because he's a gold plated arse. Put him on ignore like I have. I'm sick of reading sensible posters replying to his shite. I can't put that on ignore.You didn’t answer my question so I repeat - What has an 8 year old interview with Corbyn to do with anything I (or anyone else) have said to merit that response from you?
And you still haven’t answered my earlier question, why the ‘wow’ responses to both my posts prior you posting that interview link.
Why don’t you just say what you want to say instead of making passive aggressive responses?
Because they start with a side, and then use confirmation bias cherry-picking and after-timing to justify their position.I certainly don’t mind - (I actually hadn’t seen the news story) although some might find these stories too horrifying to want to see them posted - but what I mind is when reports like these are posted as a push back against posts relating to the appalling number of fatalities in Gaza with the intention of diminishing or even justifying Israel’s blanket bombardments of Gaza - because they are being routinely posted by those who ‘support’ what Israel are doing.
These testimonial video accounts referred to by the BBC by Israelis are beyond horrific- the animalistic hatred that drives humans to commit such heinous acts against other humans is truly incomprehensible to me.
However - For you to suggest my objection to posts of Hamas’s atrocities being used to justify the deaths of thousand of innocent children is tantamount to me being biased in favour of Hamas is ridiculous.
Why on earth do people insist on creating straw arguments from what people are saying. Surely we all agree that the deaths of any innocent people caught up in the conflict is tragic, regardless of whether they are Palestinian or Israeli?
Hamas made a big misjudgment, expecting other states to join in. Mugs.I don't know how many NSCers have been to Israel (I have) but it is almost a State of the USA, certainly backed by very wealthy US Jews hence their nuclear capability and massive superiority in conventional weapons.
Hamas didn't have a chance and are now going to reap the whirlwind. Stupid bastards.
Careful! You used the words ’wealthy’ and ‘Jew’ in the same paragraph, let alone the same sentence, I’m sure someone will be along in a minute to accuse you of antisemitism.I don't know how many NSCers have been to Israel (I have) but it is almost a State of the USA, certainly backed by very wealthy US Jews hence their nuclear capability and massive superiority in conventional weapons.
Hamas didn't have a chance and are now going to reap the whirlwind. Stupid bastards.
Go to Jerusalem, look at the Civil Buildings, see who has endowed them and where they were from.Careful! You used the words ’wealthy’ and ‘Jew’ in the same paragraph, let alone the same sentence, I’m sure someone will be along in a minute to accuse you of antisemitism.
Oh, and by the way, yep, stupid bastards.
Hamas made a big misjudgment, expecting other states to join in. Mugs.
I too have been to Israel. I would call it largely a secular European state (well, Tel Aviv, certainly), with a minority of trouble making nobbers (these being mostly American-extract 'Zionists' and other orthodoxists, lots in Jerusalem and of course all over the West Bank).
Under a state of virtual siege and threat from people who want them all in the sea. Egged on by a 'hold me back' Iran who are too cowardly to do anything more than fund and arm wanky terrorists like Hamas, while standing back and using the situation to justify their own medieval chauvinistic twat regimes.
Nail on head analysis, won't help those on the Gaza Strip of course.
Oh, no argument from me on those above points at all. I was just expecting the usual claims of stereotyping of Jewish people as wealthy (which many are) and/or influential (again probably true when measured against other groups) which then leads to accusation that those who mention this are anti-semites.Go to Jerusalem, look at the Civil Buildings, see who has endowed them and where they were from.
As I said a part of the USA, you may or may not approve but no disputing they are the Middle East Superpower and for Hamas to take them on in a full scale war was frankly ludicrous.
ethnic clensing is what we call it when other nations try this.Israelis will live there and it will thrive.
No one will take the displaced.
Job done.
The lady doth protest too much, methinksOh, no argument from me on those above points at all. I was just expecting the usual claims of stereotyping of Jewish people as wealthy (which many are) and/or influential (again probably true when measured against other groups) which then leads to accusation that those who mention this are anti-semites.
Keep calling it numpty, maybe you think if you throw enough crap that some will stick? Maybe will, maybe won’t. But guess what, I actually do not care. I am comfortable with my position, I feel no need to justify it, I know my opinions, you can only presume or guess. So please, go ahead, carry on. All the time you throw shit at me, you are not throwing it at someone who is not as at ease with themself as I am. Also, you just highlight your own narrow minded narrative, exposing yourself and those who think like you as the hypocrites that you are. Please, go ahead, entertain me.The lady doth protest too much, methinks
Are you projecting much!However - For you to suggest my objection to posts of Hamas’s atrocities being used to justify the deaths of thousand of innocent children is tantamount to me being biased in favour of Hamas is ridiculous.
Why on earth do people insist on creating straw arguments from what people are saying. Surely we all agree that the deaths of any innocent people caught up in the conflict is tragic, regardless of whether they are Palestinian or Israeli?