Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Darling doubles Inheritance tax threshold



Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
43,036
Lancing
Inheritance taxes cut for couples

Mr Darling delivers his first pre-Budget as Gordon Brown watches on
Chancellor Alistair Darling has doubled the inheritance tax threshold for married couples to £600,000 - and said it will rise to £700,000 from 2010.
He also targeted private equity bosses and "non-domiciles" in his pre-Budget report - and pledged to switch green air taxes to flights, not passengers.

Schools and hospitals will get more cash than expected but growth forecasts for 2008 were downgraded to 2-2.5%.

The Tories said it was a "pre-election budget without an election".

Shadow chancellor George Osborne said it was "weak and cynical" pre-Budget report and asked if Mr Darling had planned to reform inheritance tax before the Tories unveiled their own proposals last week.

Tighter spending

Setting out his plans, Mr Darling said Tory plans to charge a flat rate of £25,000 on non-doms - people who register abroad for tax purposes - did not add up.

He said he would consult on early legislation on non-domiciled taxpayers, as a first step introducing a charge after seven years, then a higher rate after 10.

Pre-Budget Report and Comprehensive Spending Review 2007 in full [1.5MB]
Most computers will open this document automatically, but you may need Adobe Reader

He also said he would prevent people claiming they were out of the country when they were actually in the UK - and from disguising income as capital. These measures would raise an average of £650m, he said.

Mr Darling also set out the government's Comprehensive Spending Review, which he said "will be tighter for many departments".

He said there would be an extra £400m for the armed forces, including cash for improved accommodation.

On Tuesday morning Alistair Darling told the Cabinet that the economy remained strong and well positioned to deal with increased global economic uncertainty.

Spending known

In an interview with the Financial Times last week, Mr Darling said there would undoubtedly be an effect on Britain from the "credit crunch" experienced in the US.

Spending reviews detail how much money the government will put into schools, hospitals and other public services.

In a time of increasing global instability, defence spending needs to be a priority

Mr Brown had already said that education spending in the UK will rise from £77.4bn in 2007/08 to £90bn by 2010/11.

Since 2002 the NHS has been given record annual funding increases of about 7%. There is speculation this will slow to between 3% and 3.5% by 2011/12.

The prime minister had already announced an extra £7.7bn for defence and some departments have agreed to a 5%-a-year real-terms cut over the CSR period - including HM Revenue and Customs and the Department for Work and Pensions.
 








Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
43,036
Lancing
correct Piers, stolen 2 tories policies in 1 go
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,498
Chandlers Ford
Who has to be married, anyway? The person bequeathing the house, or the people inheriting it?
 




Barrel of Fun

Abort, retry, fail
So is it still at the same amount if you are not married?

It certainly looks that way, doesn't it? The whole system seems to be weighted in favour of married couples. Why?

Were the Conservatives not getting abuse, from various detractors on this very board, for offering financial incentives to 'stay married or get married'?
 




Fatboy Stenno

Member
Feb 26, 2007
139
Haywards Heath
Surely it's about time this lame excuse for a "people's Government" is ousted from power???

Stealing ideas off the Conservatives demonstrates not only a complete lack of initiative but also utter contempt of the voting public. This is just the icing on the cake after the past couple of weeks. Bring on the Tories - they surely can't do any worse. At least if we had an election, we'd actually be able to elect a Prime Minister!

:rant::rant::rant::rant:
 




The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
correct Piers, stolen 2 tories policies in 1 go

Not quite. Two things here.

One, the difference in raising the threshold to £700k and not £1m is the difference in not helping the top 1% earners. Secondly, not raising it to a million (something the Tories intended to do) means there would be an extra £2bn in the coffers. He is spending that on Health and Education instead.
 


Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
43,036
Lancing
It certainly looks that way, doesn't it? The whole system seems to be weighted in favour of married couples. Why?

Were the Conservatives not getting abuse, from various detractors on this very board, for offering financial incentives to 'stay married or get married'?

its a blatant piss take to reward Married people and double the threshold in response to Cameron slating both factors last week but it is good news indeed for Married couples, shame they have to copy someone elses ideas if they were in an examination room they would be thrown out and failed
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,498
Chandlers Ford
If its a good idea, what does it matter whose idea it was?

Its about putting the right policies in place, not point-scoring. This attitude is EXACTLY why party politics is such a CACKFEST.
 




Uncle Buck

Ghost Writer
Jul 7, 2003
28,071
It certainly looks that way, doesn't it? The whole system seems to be weighted in favour of married couples. Why?

Were the Conservatives not getting abuse, from various detractors on this very board, for offering financial incentives to 'stay married or get married'?

It is one of the few policies that I am interested in at present. However whichever party is in power it potentially looks like currently I would still get stung heavily if the worst was to happen.
 


Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
43,036
Lancing
Not quite. Two things here.

One, the difference in raising the threshold to £700k and not £1m is the difference in not helping the top 1% earners. Secondly, not raising it to a million (something the Tories intended to do) means there would be an extra £2bn in the coffers. He is spending that on Health and Education instead.

it is extraordinary Alan how you turn any and indeed every event into a way of justifying how you were correct all along
 


The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
Surely it's about time this lame excuse for a "people's Government" is ousted from power???

Stealing ideas off the Conservatives demonstrates not only a complete lack of initiative but also utter contempt of the voting public. This is just the icing on the cake after the past couple of weeks. Bring on the Tories - they surely can't do any worse. At least if we had an election, we'd actually be able to elect a Prime Minister!

:rant::rant::rant::rant:

Everyone had their chance in 2005 ad didn't take it. Anyway, you don't have a vote for the Prime Minister, unless you are a member of a political party.

Anyhoo, as was shown in the after-speech debate, George Osborn got his figures wrong on non-Dom tax. It's a slip that would have cost the country over £2bn.
 
Last edited:




Bry Nylon

Test your smoke alarm
Helpful Moderator
Jul 21, 2003
20,386
Playing snooker
"Stealing policies again, Darling?"
 

Attachments

  • Captain_Darling.jpg
    Captain_Darling.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 319


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,498
Chandlers Ford
I thought it was just me that thought that , EVERY time I hear that name!
 


Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,868
Burgess Hill
funny name for a bloke isn't it ?
 








Timbo

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
4,311
Hassocks
I don't really understand, when do you need to be married exactly?

Surely theres going to be a massive rise in convenience marriages and then divorces once the inheritance is in place?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here