dan harding

[mejonaNO12 aka riskit]

ummm i dont quite know how to say this...bu..but he w.was g..g...good!

that was tough but my own admittance.

well played dan! some great runs down the left. more confidence!

 

[Bakesy]

ummm i dont quite know how to say this...bu..but he w.was g..g...good!

that was tough but my own admittance.

well played dan! some great runs down the left. more confidence!

Yep, the lad looked OK today.

 

[Beach Hut]

Was it Dan who got clattered ? If so what happened as it was the other side of the pitch.

We had a birds eye view of Robinson's penalty.

 

[Scotty Mac]

good game from harding. hopefully he can keep it up

 

[mejonaNO12 aka riskit]

Was it Dan who got clattered ? If so what happened as it was the other side of the pitch.

We had a birds eye view of Robinson's penalty.

connely just ran in to him for no reason. then(i dont like to accuse of such a thing) may have, by accident or not, stamped on hardings head.

now im certain his foot landed on his head but was so quick to see if it was deliberate. i dont like to think that a fellow proffesional(even tiatto) would stamp on anothers head.

 

[maidstoneseagull]

I prefer harding in the role he played today or left midfield. Thought he looked good today, couple of good crosses and support play.

 

[dougdeep]

Only Hammond was off form today. I thought Harding was good today.

 

[Bakesy]

Was it Dan who got clattered ? If so what happened as it was the other side of the pitch.

We had a birds eye view of Robinson's penalty.

Yes it was Dan.He got clattered in retalliation for an earlier offence by Dan that went unpunished.The guy went for Dan and was violent conduct.........should have been a straight red The ref was a complete c**t and i've got the sore throat to prove it!!! Also, if Robinson's wasn't a penalty then surely he should have been booked for diving.NO BLOODY CONSISTENCY WITH REFS THESE DAYS

 

[junior]

Only Hammond was off form today.

Will that be the same Dean Hammond that everyone has been saying all week how excellant he is and should be starting instead of Charlie Oatway??

 

[mejonaNO12 aka riskit]

Will that be the same Dean Hammond that everyone has been saying all week how excellant he is and should be starting instead of Charlie Oatway??

no. thats the other one

 

[Edward Scissorhands]

Yes it was Dan.He got clattered in retalliation for an earlier offence by Dan that went unpunished.The guy went for Dan and was violent conduct.........should have been a straight red The ref was a complete c**t and i've got the sore throat to prove it!!! Also, if Robinson's wasn't a penalty then surely he should have been booked for diving.NO BLOODY CONSISTENCY WITH REFS THESE DAYS

Was there any contact at all?

 

[dougdeep]

Will that be the same Dean Hammond that everyone has been saying all week how excellant he is and should be starting instead of Charlie Oatway??

It was his first off game that I can remember.

 

[ShorehamGull]

Good work from Harding today, hopefully he is getting back to his best.

 

[larus]

It was his first off game that I can remember.

I'd agree with that.

I though Dan H had a good game today, and I hope he signs a new contract with MM. If LK goes, I don't think he will be as great a loss as I thought earlier in the season. He just hasn't performed as well as I thought he would have done. Saying that, I would still like him to be tried in a free roll behind the front 2 as I think he could be a very good play-maker.

 

[Drumstick]

I though Mcgammon had a much better game today, he held the ball up, ran at players, went down the wings well.

Top marks from me.

 

[Rangdo]

Also, if Robinson's wasn't a penalty then surely he should have been booked for diving.NO BLOODY CONSISTENCY WITH REFS THESE DAYS

This assumption that if it wasn't a penalty it was a dive makes no sense to me. It could just be a fair tackle that resulted in Jake going down. I'm not sticking up for the ref, I think it was a penalty, but it is possible to make a fair challenge, get the ball, have the attacker fall over and not concede a foul either way.

 

[Yorkie]

This assumption that if it wasn't a penalty it was a dive makes no sense to me. It could just be a fair tackle that resulted in Jake going down. I'm not sticking up for the ref, I think it was a penalty, but it is possible to make a fair challenge, get the ball, have the attacker fall over and not concede a foul either way.

Tell that to the referee when a Brighton player does it

 

[Rangdo]

Tell that to the referee when a Brighton player does it

I'm not making a caase for any specific decision. My point is that just because theres a tackle and the striker goes down doesn't mean there has to be a foul or a dive. Could just be a good tackle and the striker fell over.

 

[The Great Cornholio]

I've said it before and I will say it again. Harding is a very good left wingback. He is a poor left full back. His positional sense is far too weak to play left back but when he can rampage forward with 3 Centre Backs to bail him out, he looks very good.

 

[ben andrews' girlfriend]

Was there any contact at all?

Looked a pretty conclusive YES to me.