so if ’people’ prosecuting earned bonuses for convictions and those convictions go on to be found unsound or just plain wrong, then should those ‘people’ be forced to pay back the bonuses as the prosecution is at that point proven unsuccessful.
years back when I owned my own company we completely outgrew Sage line 50 and so needed a system to give more in depth reporting and various other functionality.
we sent a brief to 5 potential providers, short listed to 2, finally made decision. 18 months into process and just 2 months away...
Yes saw E Davey yesterday with his faux ‘ooh that’s awful 🤢🤮’ don’t look at me comments.
Wouldn’t it be lovely for each and everyone held to account (prosecuted if rightful) who obstructed the investigation, those who just simply lied, as well as those who sat impassively whilst these poor poor...
usually followed by some ‘high flyer’ deciding to step back, retire, follow new paths (add whatever other lame excuse you wish) and set off into the sunset with a rather nice pension or golden hand shake which is paid for from the public purse .. and incredibly then walk into some other cosy...