Search results

I agree that if Prescott is minded to turn down Falmer, he should have done so by now. But, he was also aware of what might be percieved as gaps in the alternative sites issue and the potential legal challenge which could arise as a result. Lets not also forget that it conveniently pushes a...

Not trying to be negative, just trying to explain the situation: The Falmer inquiry, that Inspector Collyer reported on, and this current resumed inquiry are ultimately looking at the Falmer site and whether it is a suitable site. Part of the decision making process is looking at what other...

Question: I am a tad confused. As I understood it, Prescott said the there will be a Yes for Falmer if the other sires that are mentioned are not acceptable for development or some such other reason. If that is so, then I assume as soon as someone mentions Falmer, the inspector will shut them...

The letter from the ODPM says that the Secretary of State requires further evidence on a number of diferent matters, including at point 4(c): Whether there are any other sites [other than the 7 named alternative sites] that could be suitable for the proposed development having regard to the...

Can I just make a couple of general points: If the re-opened inquiry, and JP, conclude that there is a viable alternative site, the alternative site will not be granted permisson by default. In fact JP is very unlikley to make any comments on the individual alternative sites (he'll leave that...