Gotta laugh at the interview with Phil Smith on skysports "In this day and age any form of racism is completely unacceptable"
So does that mean three year's ago it was acceptable :facepalm:
Yet its proper use is maintaining general anesthesia and used as a last resort in human operations if the patient is allergic to the other better drugs. My wife has told me they hate using it as they have to be very very careful when patients are recovered - seems a great idea to use it for fun
I will add people who walk around town and do their weekly shop on a sunday while wearing a massive bluetooth earphone which flashes very second with a bright blue light.
I vote kicking the ball out when a player "may" be injured - head injuries yes, obviously bad injury yes, everything else NO
I also vote, tied in with the above, kicking the ball back to the opposition when the player clearly isn't that badly injured.
I agree with this, exactly how the majority of salesmen/women are paid, they get their basic retainer and the rest of their salary is performance related, when times are good they get big bonuses when time are bad they don't but they still get their basic salary
Problem is employment lawyers would have a field day if something like that was put into a contract and what player would want to sign a contract like that
oh ok, that's true, I'm sure I can also remember reports of poyet telling him off because of hamstring concerns, either way he still seems to have taken it on board to make the landing safer
Seeing it on sky last night, the last bit looked to be more of a sideways flip rather than his old school sumersault - I guess he has been told off enough time now about the risk of snapping his hamstrings on landing so he has changed the ending.