[Drinking] is it time to retire the pint?

Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Jul 11, 2003

61,891

The Fatherland

• Tuesday at 2:30 PM

• #1

It's about time isnt it?

I know Labour have had a tough time of it lately but they could get their polularity back on track by going with progressive policies like this.

The power of the pint: is it time to retire one of the world’s biggest beer measures?

A study suggested last week that adopting a two-thirds serve could improve public health. But is the pint really the problem?

www.theguardian.com

 

Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati

Helpful Moderator

NSC Patron

Jul 23, 2003

36,667

Up and Coming Sunny Portslade

• Tuesday at 2:32 PM

• #2

No it isn't. Just think of the opposition photo ops. Constant pictures of Farage outside a pub with a full "proper" pint, puffing a Lambert and Desperate while wearing a "Two Tier Kier" t-shirt would make me lose my lunch on a regular basis.

And Guinness HAS to be in a pint. FACT.

 

A

A mex eyecan

Well-known member

Nov 3, 2011

3,651

• Tuesday at 2:33 PM

• #3

No, no it friggin is not!
Stuff all that fancy European bollox

 

Titanic

Super Moderator

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,718

West Sussex

• Tuesday at 2:34 PM

• #4

 

Questions

Habitual User

Oct 18, 2006

25,317

Worthing

• Tuesday at 2:37 PM

• #5

HT is only saying this because he drinks all those European craft beers . He couldn’t manage a real pint of cask Scruttocks Undrinkable.

 

Westdene Seagull

aka Cap'n Carl Firecrotch

NSC Patron

Oct 27, 2003

21,414

The arse end of Hangleton

• Tuesday at 2:42 PM

• #6

Utterly pointless idea. All people will do is order two drinks to replace the pint - so they end up actually drinking more. Of course the exchequer will like the extra tax take from it.

 

CheeseRolls

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Jan 27, 2009

6,167

Shoreham Beach

• Tuesday at 2:45 PM

• #7

I think the authors raise a valid point. After all many of this countries finest specimens of public health can be seen swilling from 440Ml cans (roughly 3/4 pint) This is clearly the way to go.

 

T

The Optimist

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Apr 6, 2008

2,730

Lewisham

• Tuesday at 2:46 PM

• #8

Don’t retire the pint, but perhaps add a 2/3 pint option? A half is too small but sometimes a pint is more than I want.

 

heathgate

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Apr 13, 2015

3,770

• Tuesday at 2:48 PM

• #9

These bonkers ideas!!....sheeeesh... I saw Khan, Mayor of London lauding his meetings in Liverpool with Labour "thought leaders" and activists ...... I kid you not....

 

Washie

Well-known member

Jun 20, 2011

5,957

Eastbourne

• Tuesday at 2:49 PM

• #10

I still don't understand the need for pubs or alcohol. Alcohol just seems to cause behavioural issues.

 

H

Han Solo

Well-known member

May 25, 2024

2,093

• Tuesday at 2:50 PM

• #11

Nah f*** that. If they remove your pint (57cl) they're just going to replace it with the 50cl we get in the developed (measurement-wise) world.

That's 6-7 important centiliters gone, and chances are most pubs won't lower the prices.

From the outside, this looks like a draconian plan to take your money and give you less beer.

Long live the pint!

 

Paulie Gualtieri

Bada Bing

NSC Patron

May 8, 2018

10,252

• Tuesday at 2:50 PM

• #12

Mods, please merge with the Connolly thread

 

HeaviestTed

I’m eating

NSC Patron

Mar 23, 2023

1,934

• Tuesday at 2:50 PM

• #13

It is hard enough getting a pint at half time let alone two 500mls or whatever bleedin forin it would be.

 

T

There'll never be another

New member

May 28, 2024

11

• Tuesday at 2:52 PM

• #14

No

 

Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy

Jul 5, 2003

72,232

Living In a Box

• Tuesday at 2:57 PM

• #15

He only posts the rhetoric as a champagne socialist

 

Mustafa II

Well-known member

Oct 14, 2022

1,688

Hove

• Tuesday at 2:57 PM

• #16

It is a ridiculous idea.

People will just make the conversion, if not logically than intuitively.

People won't feel like they're getting tipsy after a couple of the 'new' glass sizes, so will associate 3 with that feeling - as a result, they've actually drunk 2.25 pints, rather than the 2 pints they had previously.

I wonder what research has gone into this - every scenario played out in my head, people will end up drinking more with smaller glass sizes.

I actually think we should go in the other direction - make glass sizes BIGGER and in metric. Scrap the pint glass for 1 litre glass.

 

dazzer6666

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Mar 27, 2013

54,894

Burgess Hill

• Tuesday at 2:59 PM

• #17

Beach Hut said:

He only posts the rhetoric as a champagne socialist

Click to expand...

Bet he doesn’t want champagne in half-pint bottles

 

beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius

Jul 21, 2003

35,843

• Tuesday at 3:02 PM

• #18

stories like this suggest we have reached a stage of civilisation where there are no real problems anymore. anyone who can devote time to measuring how many 2/3pints people would drink clearly isn't needed for any other social issues.

< raise a pint.

 

Bakero

Languidly clinical

Oct 9, 2010

14,733

Almería

• Tuesday at 3:03 PM

• #19

Read that earlier and agreed with parts. 2/3 is a good measure.

Obviously, keep the pint too but what's the problem with an extra option?

 

S

Springal

Well-known member

Feb 12, 2005

24,630

GOSBTS

• Tuesday at 3:05 PM

• #20

if a 2/3rd is on offer I tend to go for it, so can see the logic. But I doubt it would happen