Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[Albion] Matt O Riley [26/08/24 - sings on a 5-year deal]



P

Professor Plum

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2024
313
SeagullinExile said:
Not all all. I just won’t be intimidated by the likes of them, and I certainly won’t be bullied into silence just for calling out the massive over reaction to last nights events.
Click to expand...
People who complain about being "bullied into silence" are usually bullies themselves who want the freedom to antagonise without resistance. Bad luck Fatty, wrong forum. Now f*** off.
 




Titanic

Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,669
West Sussex
SeagullinExile said:
Not all all. I just won’t be intimidated by the likes of them, and I certainly won’t be bullied into silence just for calling out the massive over reaction to last nights events.
Click to expand...

ChickenBaltiPie said:
You do care, a lot, and we’re clearly far from irrelevant or you wouldn’t keep shouting it from the roof tops! The only person you’re trying to convince is yourself, you’re certainly not convincing anyone else with your little tantrums.

As has been explained to you MANY times over…

1. Polite’ish opinions are welcomed, even yours, that’s the whole point of this forum. None of us are wallflowers.

2. There is no clique, just a common theme, of individuals that take issue with the unnecessarily aggressive, toxic, bitter (‘palace’) way in which you choose to communicate. BHA has (we like to think) a ‘no dick heads policy’ so I would hope does NSC, and you sir, act like a D!ck Head so don’t get so emosh when people call you out for it. ✌🏻😘
Click to expand...

Professor Plum said:
People who complain about being "bullied into silence" are usually bullies themselves who want the freedom to antagonise without resistance. Bad luck Fatty, wrong forum. Now f*** off.
Click to expand...

[mod] Enough already. Play the ball - not the man.[/mod]
 


SeagullinExile

SeagullinExile

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2010
6,087
London
ChickenBaltiPie said:
You do care, a lot, and we’re clearly far from irrelevant or you wouldn’t keep shouting it from the roof tops! The only person you’re trying to convince is yourself, you’re certainly not convincing anyone else with your little tantrums.

As has been explained to you MANY times over…

1. Polite’ish opinions are welcomed, even yours, that’s the whole point of this forum. None of us are wallflowers.

2. There is no clique, just a common theme, of individuals that take issue with the unnecessarily aggressive, toxic, bitter (‘palace’) way in which you choose to communicate. BHA has (we like to think) a ‘no dick heads policy’ so I would hope does NSC, and you sir, act like a D!ck Head so don’t get so emosh when people call you out for it. ✌🏻😘
Click to expand...
Ffs. Still going on I see. Just don’t engage with me pal. I won’t ever back down to the likes of you. You’re wasting your time with your personal attacks and intimidation tactics. Move on please.
 


SeagullinExile

SeagullinExile

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2010
6,087
London
Professor Plum said:
People who complain about being "bullied into silence" are usually bullies themselves who want the freedom to antagonise without resistance. Bad luck Fatty, wrong forum. Now f*** off.
Click to expand...
Classy!
 








mejonaNO12 aka riskit

mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,741
England
Professor Plum said:
What do you mean, what am I going to do about it? There’s nothing I can do about except express my anger and my opinion. And where’s a good place to do that? I know, how about a football forum, in a thread discussing that very topic? For heaven’s sake. That’s what we’re all here for surely? To express opinions and emotions.

What’s really bloody annoying though is to find the place infected by trolls from Palace and Crawley whose only purpose seems to be 1) inflame and agitate other people and then 2) pretend to be so bored and pissed off with people who feel agitated as a result.
Click to expand...
The issue isn't that you are angry about it

It's the fact you are also angry at anyone else who isn't as angry as you about it.

Why worry about how others view it?

The fact you think anyone who doesn't share your view is a "troll" is bizarre to say the least.

"you should be furious like most people. To regard it as just a bit “annoying” means you’re absolutely not reading the room on this one. Understand the anger or back off" was what you said to me simply saying it was annoying. You actually told me how I should be feeling about it.

I'm sorry you are really furious about it. Others are more level headed. Don't let it wind you up.
 






Uh_huh_him

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
11,621
SeagullsoverLondon said:
Think we have to agree to disagree on this. You definitely don't see players doing what Andone did, all the time.

This isn't to take away from how bad Williams' tackle was btw.
Click to expand...
Happy to disagree, but to humour me, could you to take another look at the Andone video, and compare with the Williams challenge (below)

Andone jumps in (bad), but is trying to use that action to gain control of the ball, which is why he twists around during the impact.
He executes the challenge badly and is rightly given a red card as he catches the opponent with excessive force.
However. most of the impact of the foul comes from Andone's Arse/back hitting the opponent. His foot also catches the leg of the saints player ( who carried on in the game and had no time out for injury).

Now look again at Williams "challenge".



The impact on the players receiving the force is significantly different.
 
Last edited:


Skaville

Skaville

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
10,177
Queens Park
Professor Plum said:
Has to be too early to predict, surely? All depends on the success of the surgery, response to rehabilitation and recovery. I suppose there are average times based on previous cases but as I said earlier, it’s impossible to be accurate because every injury is unique, as is the player.
Click to expand...

Absolutely, hence what the manager said in the press conference but that was what I heard as the expectation. Fingers crossed it’s correct.
 


schmunk

schmunk

Centrist Dad
Jan 19, 2018
10,089
Mid mid mid Sussex
Uh_huh_him said:
Happy to disagree, but to humour me, could you to take another look at the ANdonevideo, and compare with the Williams challenge (below)

Andone jumps in (bad), but is trying to use that action to gain control of the ball, which is why he twists around during the impact.
He executes the challenge badly and is rightly given a red card as he catches the opponent with excessive force.
However. most of the impact of the foul comes from Andone's Arse/back hitting the opponent. His foot also catches the leg of the saints player ( who carried on in the game and had no time out for injury).

Now look again at Williams "challenge".



The impact on the players receiving the force is significantly different.
Click to expand...

I've never played football to any level but always thought Andone was too harshly criticised for that tackle. It's clear (to me) what he was trying to do, but he f***ed it up. :shrug:
 




jcdenton08

jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
12,864
schmunk said:
I've never played football to any level but always thought Andone was too harshly criticised for that tackle. It's clear (to me) what he was trying to do, but he f***ed it up. :shrug:
Click to expand...
There was the very nasty elbow prior to that which he got a retrospective 3 game ban for, plus he dived in on a couple of occasions in matches prior and got away with it. He was always “on the edge”.
 


Uh_huh_him

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
11,621
schmunk said:
I've never played football to any level but always thought Andone was too harshly criticised for that tackle. It's clear (to me) what he was trying to do, but he f***ed it up. :shrug:
Click to expand...
Also worth noting that challenge seriously impacted his own career, rather than putting at risk his opponent's career.
 






Uh_huh_him

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
11,621
jcdenton08 said:
There was the very nasty elbow prior to that which he got a retrospective 3 game ban for, plus he dived in on a couple of occasions in matches prior and got away with it. He was always “on the edge”.
Click to expand...
Did he?

Surely it was just the 3 game ban for the straight red, no?
 


jcdenton08

jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
12,864


Uh_huh_him

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
11,621
jcdenton08 said:
The elbow was missed, he wasn’t sent off during the match. He got the ban afterwards when they reviewed the footage.

www.bbc.co.uk

Brighton's Florin Andone banned for three games for elbow against West Brom - BBC Sport

Brighton's Florin Andone is banned for three games after being found guilty of an elbow to West Brom's Sam Field in Wednesday's FA Cup replay.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
My bad, I thought he was sent off during the match

Edit: Sorry I thought you meant he wasn't sent off in the Saints game.
 


kevo

kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
9,508








You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here