Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[News] Huw Edwards



A

amexer

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2011
6,607
When his name cropped first when he paid girl 20/30k the police may have been peed off family did not want to pursue case and have been digging deeper ever since.
 






B

Brian Fantana

Well-known member
Oct 8, 2006
7,488
In the field
Thunder Bolt said:
You can change the settings in each group you are in.
Click to expand...

I think even having been sent the photos would potentially be enough to meet the guidelines, whether or not someone saved them or not. Even if you didn't save anything, they could still presumably exist on a Whatsapp server somewhere that could be accessed via warrant.
 


dazzer6666

dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
54,724
Burgess Hill
Bold Seagull said:
But, as a manager you're more effective approaching the situation with 'how can we help you do your job better' rather than 'you're not doing your job well enough'. Both tell the person that what they have done isn't good enough, but one is a more constructive approach. This is how work place cultures form and they're incredibly hard to change if everyone uses the second approach rather than the first.

CEO is probably right because you can be more ruthless with staff if you have followed a constructive performance supporting process. If you've done all you can and they're still underperforming then your mechanism for moving them on is easier.
Click to expand...
Yeah but I shortened an example (from several) into a quick post…….this was often after months of support/training/‘reasonable adjustments’ and the like (and I was usually the recipient of the complaint - not the line manager)
 


A

amexer

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2011
6,607
Thank goodness not what is involved in this case but only time anything adult obscene has ever appeared on my laptop is several times when I have been looking for an Albion stream
 














R

Reddleman

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
2,043
The thing I genuinely don’t get is how someone of his profile and fame thinks he can do stuff like this and not get caught. It’s literally insane.
 






nwgull

nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
14,365
Manchester
Reddleman said:
The thing I genuinely don’t get is how someone of his profile and fame thinks he can do stuff like this and not get caught. It’s literally insane.
Click to expand...
I was wondering this. Did he maybe think his identity wasn’t revealed to the blokes he was getting the pics off of?
 


Questions

Questions

Habitual User
Oct 18, 2006
25,294
Worthing
If any good has come from this whole episode it at least demonstrates we need to delete better lads. Proper porn I’m talking about… Like she-male stuff.
 


T

The Optimist

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 6, 2008
2,724
Lewisham
Brian Fantana said:
I think even having been sent the photos would potentially be enough to meet the guidelines, whether or not someone saved them or not. Even if you didn't save anything, they could still presumably exist on a Whatsapp server somewhere that could be accessed via warrant.
Click to expand...
Isn’t Whatsapp end to end encrypted, meaning that nothing exists that can be accessed on a WhatsApp server?
 




M

marlowe

Well-known member
Dec 13, 2015
4,130
"Making" an indecent image of a child has quite a broad interpretation and it can include simply openening an email attachment, which seems a bit harsh as how do you know the attachment contains child porn unless you open it.

Presumably to establish guilt it would have to come with a prior warning as in "Please find attached...." so there was evidence that you had prior knowledge of what it was you were opening, or if not evidence that the image had been solicited by you..

Indecent and Prohibited Images of Children | The Crown Prosecution Service​


www.cps.gov.uk
www.cps.gov.uk
From the above link of the CPS website...

“To make” has been widely interpreted by the courts and can include the following:
  • opening an attachment to an email containing an image: R v Smith; R v Jayson [2003] 1 Cr. App. R. 13
 


Cheshire Cat

Cheshire Cat

The most curious thing..
Nov 4, 2006
11,731
Sitting on a bough of a tree a few yards off...
de la zouch said:
The BBC knew in November, kept on paying him and kept it quiet. Both of these actions are despicable. However they have a track record …
Click to expand...
The BBC knew he had been arrested, but that means nothing. He might have been not guilty, and you can't sack anyone on mere allegations. They say they would have fired him if and when he had been charged, but he resigned before then.

You can't blame the BBC for keeping anything quiet. There are legal restrictions on they an and cannot report in these cases. It isn't like a social media witch hunt (compare the EDL idiots at Southport yesterday).
 








Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

I believe in Joe Hendry
Oct 4, 2003
11,820
Papak said:
Not following the story in huge detail - is the sender also facing charges?
Click to expand...
He was charged previously and convicted of 7 charges in March. He received a 12 month suspended sentence.

Which makes the chances of Edwards being jailed seem slim.

It was the originally unrelated investigation into this person that led the police to Edwards when they did the forensic analysis of his phone.
 


Hugo Rune

Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
23,362
Brighton
Cheshire Cat said:
The BBC knew he had been arrested, but that means nothing. He might have been not guilty, and you can't sack anyone on mere allegations. They say they would have fired him if and when he had been charged, but he resigned before then.

You can't blame the BBC for keeping anything quiet. There are legal restrictions on they an and cannot report in these cases. It isn't like a social media witch hunt (compare the EDL idiots at Southport yesterday).
Click to expand...
Indeed.

You can’t sack someone because they have been arrested. He could have rinsed them for millions for unfair dismissal.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here