Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Napoli interested in Billy Gilmour **Sold 30/08/24**



Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,617
GOSBTS
£12M for a player that had an ‘ok’ / ‘good’ one season is fine especially if the new manager doesn’t want him. Shame we lost a season with his struggles and as victim of narrow minded Roberto
 




Big Vern

Member
Feb 28, 2024
37
Gross and Gilmour following Caicedo and Macca out of the door, that’s three and a bit huge players gone, I do worry we will be found wanting in that department.
 


Gabbiano

Well-known member
Dec 18, 2017
1,662
Spank the Manc
Less than we sold Dan Burn for several years ago. Burn was a much more limited player than Gilmour.

There is nobody else at the club with the range of passing that Billy provided, he's always on the move, always calling for the ball and orchestrating play. He's regularly Scotland's best player, he's a Champions League winner and a PL regular.

Yes he's small and can get bullied against physical opponents, no he doesn't score goals. That's why he's not a £50m player.

His performance against Marseille last season was one of the best individual performances all year.

Can only assume that Hurzeler has said he's not needed or Gilmour has begged to return to working with Conte.

I hope we have some clever clauses in there. Bargain for Napoli. I can see him doing well in Serie A - yes it's a physical league but slower paced than the PL, more time for Billy to pick his passes.
 
















Johnny RoastBeef

These aren't the players you're looking for.
Jan 11, 2016
3,449
For anyone saying we shouldn't sell him.

If we didn't have him and were looking to sign a centre midfielder, how happy would you be if we were linked to Gomez and Gruda, and ended up with Gilmour?

1000013764.png

1000013765.png
 




Gabbiano

Well-known member
Dec 18, 2017
1,662
Spank the Manc
For anyone saying we shouldn't sell him.

If we didn't have him and were looking to sign a centre midfielder, how happy would you be if we were linked to Gomez and Gruda, and ended up with Gilmour?

View attachment 186217
View attachment 186218
Billy should do better defensively. His role was never to be shooting all the time, but admittedly he's not good at that either.

How does he compare in passing stats? Cherry picking a few stats that show him in a bad light doesn't show the full picture.
 




Johnny RoastBeef

These aren't the players you're looking for.
Jan 11, 2016
3,449
Billy should do better defensively. His role was never to be shooting all the time, but admittedly he's not good at that either.

How does he compare in passing stats? Cherry picking a few stats that show him in a bad light doesn't show the full picture.

What good is passing if it goes nowhere?

Passing is vanity, Goals and assists are sanity.
 


GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
48,497
Gloucester
For anyone saying we shouldn't sell him.

If we didn't have him and were looking to sign a centre midfielder, how happy would you be if we were linked to Gomez and Gruda, and ended up with Gilmour?

View attachment 186217
View attachment 186218
One of them is playing in the PL; one of them is playing in the USA - have the stats been adjusted accordingly?

......thought not.
 


Gabbiano

Well-known member
Dec 18, 2017
1,662
Spank the Manc
What good is passing if it goes nowhere?

Passing is vanity, Goals and assists are sanity.
Because he passes to someone else who then gets the assist, to have the vision to start off an attack or to retain possession under pressure. What's the value of a midfielder who is good at passing - really?

He was always the first pass out of defence and forward. He's rarely in a position to score as a result, that's not his role.

Don't get me wrong, he has limitations, for someone in that role he should perform better defensively. But when he has a partner in the pivot who is more physical and can protect him a bit, he really shines.

Edit: Saying all this, I'm not against selling him. I'm against selling him for as little as £12m.
 
Last edited:




Han Solo

Well-known member
May 25, 2024
1,922
For anyone saying we shouldn't sell him.

If we didn't have him and were looking to sign a centre midfielder, how happy would you be if we were linked to Gomez and Gruda, and ended up with Gilmour?

View attachment 186217
View attachment 186218
These players don't play in the same role and also not in the same league.

I understand from Bissouma days that the NUMBER ONE ability in any defensive minded midfielder is supposedly to shoot like Socrates. The NUMBER TWO ability is to be tall as f***, because thats a British football fantasy. Lots of people on NSC has gone on about Billy not being "big enough" for Hurzeler football. This is because they're projecting their own fantasy on to the uncertainess of Hurzelian tactics. My guess, hope and firm belief is that the team won't be built around players being tall.

I'd guess that for any defensive playmaker in our team, passing stats are going to be a lot more interesting than the 0-2 long distance shots per game a player in that role could expect.

The worst part of the comparison however is that Billy Gilmour is playing in the best league in the world while Diego Gomez has been playing in the 25th or so best. Assuming he is better than Billy is like assuming you're better than Lewis Hamilton because you bet your buddy at Mario Kart.
 


Johnny RoastBeef

These aren't the players you're looking for.
Jan 11, 2016
3,449
These players don't play in the same role and also not in the same league.

I understand from Bissouma days that the NUMBER ONE ability in any defensive minded midfielder is supposedly to shoot like Socrates. The NUMBER TWO ability is to be tall as f***, because thats a British football fantasy. Lots of people on NSC has gone on about Billy not being "big enough" for Hurzeler football. This is because they're projecting their own fantasy on to the uncertainess of Hurzelian tactics. My guess, hope and firm belief is that the team won't be built around players being tall.

I'd guess that for any defensive playmaker in our team, passing stats are going to be a lot more interesting than the 0-2 long distance shots per game a player in that role could expect.

The worst part of the comparison however is that Billy Gilmour is playing in the best league in the world while Diego Gomez has been playing in the 25th or so best. Assuming he is better than Billy is like assuming you're better than Lewis Hamilton because you bet your buddy at Mario Kart.

That we are entertaining offers for Billy and bidding for Gomez suggests that the club don't feel the same concerns over a disparity in the quality of the leagues that you do.

The fact that so few clubs are vying for him is a good indicator of his importance.

My initial point remains, if we were bidding to sign one of Gilmour or Gomez, I'd far rather we signed Gomez.
 


Han Solo

Well-known member
May 25, 2024
1,922
What good is passing if it goes nowhere?

Passing is vanity, Goals and assists are sanity.
Billys passing does go somewhere though - usually to a teammate closer to the opponents goal.

You can take a look at Fulham away if you want to get that "man, it'd be quite useful to have a player who can pass forward to a team mate" feeling.
 


Johnny RoastBeef

These aren't the players you're looking for.
Jan 11, 2016
3,449
Billys passing does go somewhere though - usually to a teammate closer to the opponents goal.

You can take a look at Fulham away if you want to get that "man, it'd be quite useful to have a player who can pass forward to a team mate" feeling.

1 assist a season suggests otherwise
 




Withdean11

Well-known member
Feb 18, 2007
2,887
Brighton/Hyde
Are we really that light in midfield without Gross/Gilmore?

CD/DM - Weiffer/Baleba
CM - Weiffer/Baleba/Milner/Gomez/Yalcouye/Hinshelwood/(Ayari?)
AM - (Gruda?)/Enciso/Pedro/Gomez/Facundo/Sarmiento
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
52,107
Goldstone
For anyone saying we shouldn't sell him.

If we didn't have him and were looking to sign a centre midfielder, how happy would you be if we were linked to Gomez and Gruda, and ended up with Gilmour?

If we could buy a proven PL player to fill the roll of squad player, for £12m, I'd be happy.

If we can have better options to start when fit, then great. But do you seriously think that when we've got some injuries and some tired legs, that we're always going to have better options to bring on than WBG?

I can easily see us playing games where we're thinking 'shit, it would've been handy if Billy was available'.

Now it might be that the club have enough options that even when we're down to bare bones we don't need him, in which case letting him go is the right move. But I am surprised that we're going to have that many good options.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here